Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

69Upcoming
71.9%Accuracy
4694Settled
Umag clay ✗ Missed High · 74%
F. Cobolli
vs
R. Burruchaga
74%
26%
0–2
Granby, Canada hard ✓ Correct High · 70%
L. Draxl
vs
J. Trotter
70%
30%
2–1
Bastad clay ✓ Correct High · 66%
D. Altmaier
vs
L. Darderi
34%
66%
0–2
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 69%
D. Astakhova
vs
N. Noha Akugue
31%
69%
1–2
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 73%
F. Jones
vs
F. Urgesi
73%
27%
2–1
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 75%
E. Mićić
vs
Q. Zheng
25%
75%
0–2
Umag clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
F. Gomez
vs
M. Arnaldi
29%
71%
1–2
Bastad clay ✗ Missed High · 70%
S. Travaglia
vs
M. Navone
30%
70%
2–0
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 72%
K. Penickova
vs
A. Falei
28%
72%
1–2
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 77%
T. Gentzsch
vs
P. de Lange
77%
23%
2–0
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 76%
P. Makk
vs
T. Wild
24%
76%
1–2
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 93%
H. Dellien
vs
I. Xilas
93%
7%
2–0
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 77%
H. Vandewinkel
vs
W. Falkowska
77%
23%
2–1
Gstaad clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
A. Rinderknech
vs
C. Tabur
71%
29%
2–1
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 66%
A. Nedić
vs
E. Dalla Valle
34%
66%
0–2
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 70%
F. Romano
vs
D. Galan
30%
70%
0–2
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 79%
L. Wessels
vs
K. Coppejans
21%
79%
0–2
WTA 125K Kitzbuhel, Austria Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 87%
J. Grabher
vs
E. Perelygina
87%
13%
2–0
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
E. Yaneva
vs
S. Lansere
71%
29%
2–0
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✗ Missed High · 70%
D. Blanch
vs
B. Tomić
70%
30%
1–2
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 71%
M. Lajal
vs
T. Svajda
71%
29%
2–1
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 90%
C. Langmo
vs
Y. Wu
10%
90%
0–2
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 70%
M. Imamura
vs
J. McCabe
30%
70%
0–2
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✗ Missed High · 69%
S. Johnson
vs
R. Bertola
31%
69%
2–0
Granby, Canada hard ✓ Correct High · 70%
D. Milavsky
vs
D. Chan
70%
30%
2–0
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 81%
T. Valentová
vs
S. Costoulas
81%
19%
2–0
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 74%
M. Timofeeva
vs
A. Li
26%
74%
0–2
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 79%
E. Zhu
vs
Y. Bu
21%
79%
1–2
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 72%
F. Pace
vs
E. Vedder
28%
72%
0–2
Umag clay ✓ Correct High · 77%
F. Gomez
vs
N. McDonald
77%
23%
2–0
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.