← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| C. Langmo | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Y. Wu | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ C. Langmo
▼ Y. Wu
Match facts
Tournament
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles
Category
Challenger
Round
Round of 32
Surface
hard
Court
Center Court
City
Nebraska City
First serve
C. Langmo
Total games
5–12
C. Langmo · match stats · Y. Wu
5Aces1
5Double faults0
68%First serve in58%
64%First-serve points won77%
71%Second serve in100%
24%Second-serve points won68%
56%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted44%
27%Return points won49%
27Service points won33
12Receiver points won26
39Total points won59
5Games won12
4Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak8
2Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 3–1 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 2–0 | 4–0 |
Figures read C. Langmo first.
Set 243 min · 10 games · newest first
4-6
game 10
Y. Wu serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
4-5
game 9
C. Langmo serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
4-4
game 8
Y. Wu serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
4-3
game 7
C. Langmo serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
4-2
game 6
Y. Wu serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-2
game 5
C. Langmo serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-2
game 4
Y. Wu serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-1
game 3
C. Langmo serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-1
game 2
Y. Wu serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-0
game 1
C. Langmo serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
Set 136 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
Y. Wu serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-5
game 6
C. Langmo serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-4
game 5
Y. Wu serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
C. Langmo serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-2
game 3
Y. Wu serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-1
game 2
C. Langmo serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
0-1
game 1
Y. Wu serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
Point chips read C. Langmo first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
C. LangmoY. Wu
90%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+361 places)
- Dominant on this surface (74% win rate)
- More titles on this surface
- Better on break points