Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

153Upcoming
64.3%Accuracy
9975Settled
Upcoming Today Settled Any confidence High Medium
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct High · 81%
N. Gombos
vs
M. Majdandžić
81%
19%
2–0
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Low · 52%
L. Staeheli
vs
C. J. Lock
48%
52%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✗ Missed High · 72%
O. Luz
vs
A. Sanchez Quilez
28%
72%
2–0
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct High · 69%
Y. Morderger
vs
L. Nguyen Tan
31%
69%
0–2
Contrexeville, France clay ✗ Missed Low · 50%
Y. Bartashevich
vs
M. S. Popa
50%
50%
0–2
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 65%
L. Iemmi
vs
H. Bernet
35%
65%
0–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
A. Marti Pujolras
vs
N. V. S. Prashanth
71%
29%
2–0
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Low · 53%
M. M. Partal
vs
S. Hamza Reguig
47%
53%
0–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 56%
L. Frunza
vs
N. K. Sinha
44%
56%
0–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
R. Nijboer
vs
M. Bertimon
58%
42%
2–1
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct High · 84%
T. Wild
vs
O. Majdandžić
84%
16%
2–0
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 76%
O. Prihodko
vs
L. Rottoli
76%
24%
2–0
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Low · 54%
W. Jansen
vs
S. Ziegann
54%
46%
2–0
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✗ Missed Low · 52%
V. Melnic
vs
M. Walters
52%
48%
0–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
T. Papamalamis
vs
N. Parizzia
58%
42%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✗ Missed High · 74%
V. Marysko
vs
V. Durasović
26%
74%
2–0
Milano, Italy clay ✗ Missed High · 88%
F. Diaz Acosta
vs
M. Cecchinato
12%
88%
2–1
Brasov, Romania clay ✗ Missed High · 70%
K. Smith
vs
Z. Piros
70%
30%
0–2
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 65%
L. Berto
vs
L. Bocchi
35%
65%
0–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
N. Schell
vs
M. De Krom
39%
61%
0–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 67%
G. Campana Lee
vs
F. Bidan
67%
33%
2–0
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 62%
A. Monnot
vs
J. Gimbrère
62%
38%
2–0
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct High · 87%
A. Herrero Linana
vs
D. Vaissaud
87%
13%
2–1
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Low · 52%
N. Ratiu
vs
K. Rahmani
52%
48%
0–2
Contrexeville, France clay ✗ Missed High · 70%
P. Kudermetova
vs
L. Boulard
70%
30%
0–2
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct High · 75%
S. Seifert
vs
R. Molleker
25%
75%
0–2
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct Low · 53%
S. Pieri
vs
N. Larwig
53%
47%
2–0
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 70%
G. Villanueva
vs
J. Kovalik
70%
30%
2–1
Trieste, Italy clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
G. Crivellaro
vs
A. Rubio Fierros
44%
56%
1–1
Cary, USA hard ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
T. Legout
vs
E. Winter
58%
42%
2–0
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.