Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

153Upcoming
64.3%Accuracy
9974Settled
Upcoming Today Settled Any confidence High Medium
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 63%
N. Basiletti
vs
A. Abbagnato
63%
37%
2–0
Granby, Canada hard ✓ Correct High · 90%
J. Trotter
vs
J. Horwood
90%
10%
2–0
Iasi clay ✓ Correct High · 88%
V. Lepchenko
vs
M. Burcescu
88%
12%
2–1
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
E. Mićić
vs
A. Kulikova
44%
56%
2–1
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✗ Missed Medium · 64%
T. Fancutt
vs
K. Bigun
36%
64%
2–1
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Low · 52%
L. Wessels
vs
S. Paardekooper
48%
52%
2–0
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✗ Missed High · 88%
R. Molleker
vs
D. Donders
88%
12%
1–2
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct Medium · 63%
V. Morvayova
vs
E. Nepliy
63%
37%
2–0
Wimbledon, Men grass ✓ Correct High · 75%
J. Sinner
vs
A. Zverev
75%
25%
3–1
Umag clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
M. Cecchinato
vs
G. Olivieri
58%
42%
2–0
Umag clay ✗ Missed Medium · 60%
L. Neumayer
vs
M. Topo
60%
40%
0–2
Umag clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
J. Prado Angelo
vs
N. Sanchez Izquierdo
44%
56%
2–0
Umag clay ✗ Missed Low · 55%
A. Guerrieri
vs
F. Gomez
55%
45%
0–2
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 82%
H. Moriya
vs
A. Petrović
82%
18%
2–1
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✗ Missed High · 72%
A. Rafiq
vs
E. Aguiard
28%
72%
2–1
Bastad clay ✓ Correct High · 75%
N. Slavić
vs
M. Damas
25%
75%
0–2
Cordenons, Italy clay ✗ Missed High · 75%
D. Salazar Martinez
vs
F. Arnaboldi
25%
75%
2–1
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✗ Missed High · 71%
A. Marti Pujolras
vs
A. Forger
71%
29%
0–2
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
A. Mazzola
vs
F. Gandolfi
71%
29%
2–0
Granby, Canada hard ✓ Correct High · 69%
V. Gurenko
vs
G. Dalmasso
31%
69%
0–2
Granby, Canada hard ✓ Correct High · 66%
E. Roux
vs
A. Ganesan
34%
66%
0–2
Granby, Canada hard ✗ Missed Low · 51%
C. Bouchelaghem
vs
L. Vithoontien
49%
51%
2–0
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 81%
N. Hibino
vs
M. Tona
81%
19%
2–0
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 68%
L. Tagger
vs
M. Sieg
68%
32%
2–0
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 71%
A. Ito
vs
Y. Mansouri
71%
29%
2–0
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 60%
A. Hesse
vs
Y. Kotliar
60%
40%
1–2
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 68%
D. Soke
vs
P. Nugroho
32%
68%
0–2
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 70%
A. Binda
vs
A. Gil Garcia
70%
30%
2–0
Bastad clay ✗ Missed High · 66%
R. Carballés Baena
vs
C. Sanchez Jover
66%
34%
0–1
Iasi clay ✓ Correct High · 77%
M. Kozyreva
vs
A. Ibragimova
23%
77%
0–2
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.