Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

154Upcoming
64.3%Accuracy
9973Settled
Gstaad clay ✓ Correct Medium · 63%
Y. Hanfmann
vs
V. Vacherot
37%
63%
1–2
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 75%
E. Mićić
vs
Q. Zheng
25%
75%
0–2
Umag clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
J. Prado Angelo
vs
D. Džumhur
42%
58%
0–2
Umag clay ✗ Missed Medium · 55%
T. Etcheverry
vs
D. Merida
55%
45%
0–2
Umag clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
F. Gomez
vs
M. Arnaldi
29%
71%
1–2
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct Medium · 60%
G. Knutson
vs
L. Tararudee
40%
60%
1–2
Bastad clay ✗ Missed High · 70%
S. Travaglia
vs
M. Navone
30%
70%
2–0
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 72%
K. Penickova
vs
A. Falei
28%
72%
1–2
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 77%
T. Gentzsch
vs
P. de Lange
77%
23%
2–0
Iasi clay ✗ Missed Medium · 61%
A. Bondár
vs
T. Zidanšek
61%
39%
1–2
Bastad clay ✗ Missed Medium · 58%
N. Borges
vs
G. Dimitrov
42%
58%
2–0
WTA 125K Kitzbuhel, Austria Women Singles clay ✓ Correct Low · 54%
E. Andreeva
vs
M. Ristić
54%
46%
2–1
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct Low · 54%
H. Tan
vs
A. Gasanova
54%
46%
2–0
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 76%
P. Makk
vs
T. Wild
24%
76%
1–2
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 93%
H. Dellien
vs
I. Xilas
93%
7%
2–0
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 77%
H. Vandewinkel
vs
W. Falkowska
77%
23%
2–1
Gstaad clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
A. Rinderknech
vs
C. Tabur
71%
29%
2–1
WTA 125K Kitzbuhel, Austria Women Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
V. Erjavec
vs
M. Barthel
44%
56%
2–0
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 66%
A. Nedić
vs
E. Dalla Valle
34%
66%
0–2
Iasi clay ✓ Correct Low · 53%
Y. Putintseva
vs
A. Charaeva
53%
47%
2–0
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
G. Villanueva
vs
J. Martin Manzano
61%
39%
2–0
Cordenons, Italy clay ✗ Missed Medium · 57%
F. Bondioli
vs
G. I. Justo
43%
57%
2–0
Bastad clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
B. Van de Zandschulp
vs
A. Vallejo
42%
58%
1–2
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 70%
F. Romano
vs
D. Galan
30%
70%
0–2
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 79%
L. Wessels
vs
K. Coppejans
21%
79%
0–2
WTA 125K Kitzbuhel, Austria Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 87%
J. Grabher
vs
E. Perelygina
87%
13%
2–0
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✗ Missed Low · 53%
L. Radivojević
vs
D. Chiesa
53%
47%
0–2
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
E. Yaneva
vs
S. Lansere
71%
29%
2–0
Gstaad clay ✗ Missed Low · 53%
R. Collignon
vs
L. Sonego
47%
53%
2–0
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✗ Missed High · 70%
D. Blanch
vs
B. Tomić
70%
30%
1–2
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.