Tennis Predictions
Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.
139Upcoming
64.3%Accuracy
9995Settled
WTA 125K Brescia, Italy Women Singles
clay
✗ Missed
Medium · 56%
vs
2–1
WTA 125K Brescia, Italy Women Singles
clay
✓ Correct
High · 68%
vs
2–1
Parma, Italy
clay
✓ Correct
Medium · 56%
vs
0–2
Parma, Italy
clay
✗ Missed
Low · 50%
vs
0–2
Parma, Italy
clay
✓ Correct
High · 74%
vs
2–0
WTA 125K Modena, Italy Women Singles
clay
✗ Missed
Medium · 62%
vs
2–0
Nottingham
grass
✓ Correct
Low · 52%
vs
2–0
Nottingham
grass
✗ Missed
High · 71%
vs
0–2
Nottingham 2, Great Britain
grass
✓ Correct
Medium · 57%
vs
2–0
Nottingham 2, Great Britain
grass
✓ Correct
Low · 51%
vs
0–2
Nottingham
grass
✗ Missed
High · 65%
vs
2–0
Nottingham
grass
✓ Correct
Low · 55%
vs
2–1
WTA 125K Modena, Italy Women Singles
clay
✓ Correct
Medium · 63%
vs
1–2
Ilkley, Great Britain
grass
✓ Correct
High · 75%
vs
2–1
London
grass
✗ Missed
Medium · 55%
vs
2–0
ATP Challenger Cattolica, Italy Men Singles
clay
✓ Correct
High · 78%
vs
2–1
San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
clay
✗ Missed
Medium · 59%
vs
1–2
Nottingham
grass
✓ Correct
Medium · 56%
vs
2–0
Lyon, France
clay
✗ Missed
High · 75%
vs
1–2
London
grass
✓ Correct
Low · 52%
vs
1–2
Nottingham 2, Great Britain
grass
✓ Correct
High · 83%
vs
2–0
's-Hertogenbosch
grass
✗ Missed
High · 71%
vs
2–0
Nottingham 2, Great Britain
grass
✓ Correct
High · 80%
vs
0–2
Nottingham 2, Great Britain
grass
✗ Missed
High · 77%
vs
2–0
London
grass
✓ Correct
Medium · 56%
vs
0–2
London
grass
✓ Correct
Low · 51%
vs
1–2
Ilkley, Great Britain
grass
✓ Correct
Medium · 58%
vs
0–2
Nottingham 2, Great Britain
grass
✓ Correct
High · 70%
vs
2–1
San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
clay
✗ Missed
High · 72%
vs
2–0
London
grass
✗ Missed
High · 67%
vs
0–2
⚡ This page, via API Pro
Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):
GET
/tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.