Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

57Upcoming
59.0%Accuracy
3770Settled
Bastad, Sweden clay ✓ Correct Medium · 62%
M. Barthel
vs
L. Radivojević
38%
62%
0–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Medium · 59%
Y. Zhou
vs
R. Catry
59%
41%
2–0
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 64%
H. Barton
vs
S. Kopp
64%
36%
0–2
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct Medium · 65%
G. I. Justo
vs
G. Kravchenko
65%
35%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
L. Djere
vs
G. Bueno
61%
39%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✗ Missed Medium · 65%
D. Dedura-Palomero
vs
C. Tabur
35%
65%
2–1
Bogota, Colombia clay ✓ Correct Medium · 55%
V. Aboian
vs
L. Alvarez Valdes
45%
55%
1–2
Bogota, Colombia clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
F. Zeballos
vs
L. Andrade Da Silva
42%
58%
0–2
Bogota, Colombia clay ✗ Missed Medium · 58%
A. Magadan
vs
J. Rodriguez Rodriguez
42%
58%
2–0
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 64%
S. Palosi
vs
Z. Kolar
36%
64%
0–2
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 55%
F. Curmi
vs
O. Dodin
55%
45%
2–0
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
H. Squire
vs
A. Guillen Meza
58%
42%
2–0
Wimbledon, Women grass ✓ Correct Medium · 60%
M. Keys
vs
L. Noskova
40%
60%
0–2
Bogota, Colombia clay ✓ Correct Medium · 64%
D. Popko
vs
C. F. S. Rojas
64%
36%
2–0
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 64%
R. M. Papoe
vs
L. Midon
36%
64%
0–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 55%
S. Fomin
vs
M. Dhamne
55%
45%
1–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Medium · 57%
A. Barroso Campos
vs
G. Dalmasso
57%
43%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✗ Missed Medium · 60%
M. Rehberg
vs
M. Kouamé
40%
60%
2–0
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
M. Chazal
vs
E. Demanet
56%
44%
0–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 57%
M. Damas
vs
H. Huens
57%
43%
2–0
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
C. Chidekh
vs
M. Janvier
61%
39%
2–1
Trieste, Italy clay ✗ Missed Medium · 64%
F. Roncadelli
vs
M. Ribecai
64%
36%
0–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 56%
A. Donski
vs
J. Čižek
56%
44%
2–0
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Medium · 63%
A. Vales
vs
M. Zhu
63%
37%
2–0
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 57%
K. Wehnelt
vs
M. Van der Meerschen
57%
43%
2–0
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
O. Wallin
vs
M. Neuchrist
58%
42%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct Medium · 56%
J. Opitz
vs
M. Petković
44%
56%
0–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✗ Missed Medium · 57%
F. Bass
vs
H. Hoeyeraal
57%
43%
0–2
Wimbledon, Women grass ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
M. Bouzkova
vs
E. Mertens
39%
61%
0–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 56%
D. Poljak
vs
S. H. Haita
44%
56%
0–2
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.