Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

68Upcoming
71.9%Accuracy
4695Settled
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 89%
Y. Wu
vs
P. Marinkov
89%
11%
2–0
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✗ Missed High · 70%
M. Houkes
vs
D. Jorda Sanchis
30%
70%
2–0
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 65%
V. Morvayova
vs
S. Bejlek
35%
65%
0–2
Gstaad clay ✗ Missed High · 70%
D. Stricker
vs
J. Munar
30%
70%
2–0
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✗ Missed High · 66%
H. Moriya
vs
T. Fancutt
66%
34%
1–2
Cordenons, Italy clay ✗ Missed High · 68%
I. Montes-de la Torre
vs
L. Angelini
68%
32%
0–2
Iasi clay ✓ Correct High · 75%
N. Podoroska
vs
P. Marčinko
25%
75%
1–2
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 86%
M. Argyrokastriti
vs
L. Tagger
14%
86%
0–2
WTA 125K Istanbul 2, Turkiye Women Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 85%
G. Knutson
vs
I. Kurt
85%
15%
2–1
WTA Athens, Greece Women Singles hard ✗ Missed High · 74%
M. Linette
vs
M. Hontama
74%
26%
0–2
Granby, Canada hard ✓ Correct High · 68%
J. Trotter
vs
B. T. George
68%
32%
2–1
Bastad clay ✓ Correct High · 66%
J. De Jong
vs
V. Gaubas
66%
34%
2–0
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✗ Missed High · 74%
P. de Lange
vs
M. Geerts
26%
74%
2–0
Iasi clay ✗ Missed High · 65%
V. Lepchenko
vs
A. Ibragimova
65%
35%
0–2
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✗ Missed High · 69%
D. Kuzmanov
vs
R. Nijboer
69%
31%
0–2
Iasi clay ✓ Correct High · 70%
L. Romero Gormaz
vs
Z. Kulambayeva
70%
30%
2–0
Iasi clay ✓ Correct High · 71%
E. Avanesyan
vs
I. Fetecău
71%
29%
2–0
WTA 125K Kitzbuhel, Austria Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 69%
J. Grabher
vs
E. R. Bertea
69%
31%
2–1
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles clay ✗ Missed High · 69%
M. Alves
vs
J. Kumstat
69%
31%
0–2
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 84%
L. Radivojević
vs
Y. Ren
84%
16%
2–0
WTA 125K Rome, Italy Women Singles clay ✓ Correct High · 77%
F. Jones
vs
D. Spiteri
77%
23%
2–1
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 91%
G. Villanueva
vs
G. Gandolfi
91%
9%
2–0
Iasi clay ✓ Correct High · 73%
E. Pridankina
vs
G. García Pérez
73%
27%
2–0
Cordenons, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 80%
O. Prihodko
vs
G. Crivellaro
80%
20%
2–0
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 84%
Y. Wu
vs
P. Maloney
84%
16%
2–0
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 68%
A. Rai
vs
E. Zhu
32%
68%
0–2
Granby, Canada hard ✓ Correct High · 67%
K. Pearson
vs
S. Kirchheimer
33%
67%
0–2
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 71%
R. Karki
vs
P. Marinkov
29%
71%
0–2
Granby, Canada hard ✗ Missed High · 74%
R. Tokuda
vs
S. Rozin
74%
26%
0–2
ATP Challenger Lincoln (NE), USA Men Singles hard ✓ Correct High · 70%
C. Langmo
vs
A. Kobelt
70%
30%
2–0
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.