← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| K. Rice | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| M. Lajal | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
Vancouver, Canada Men Singles
Category
Challenger
Round
Semifinals
Surface
hard
Court
Centre Court
City
Vancouver
First serve
K. Rice
Total games
5–12
K. Rice · match stats · M. Lajal
0Aces5
3Double faults5
56%First serve in49%
43%First-serve points won91%
89%Second serve in79%
52%Second-serve points won42%
58%Break points saved50%
50%Break points converted42%
34%Return points won53%
29Service points won31
16Receiver points won30
45Total points won61
5Games won12
4Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak8
2Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–1 | 3–2 |
| Set 2 | 0–4 | 0–3 |
Figures read K. Rice first.
Set 240 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
K. Rice serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
2-5
game 7
M. Lajal serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-4
game 6
K. Rice serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-3
game 5
M. Lajal serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
2-2
game 4
K. Rice serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-2
game 3
M. Lajal serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-1
game 2
K. Rice serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-1
game 1
M. Lajal serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
Set 138 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
K. Rice serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
3-5
game 8
M. Lajal serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
3-4
game 7
K. Rice serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
3-3
game 6
M. Lajal serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
3-2
game 5
K. Rice serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
2-2
game 4
M. Lajal serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
2-1
game 3
K. Rice serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-1
game 2
M. Lajal serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-1
game 1
K. Rice serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
Point chips read K. Rice first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
K. RiceM. Lajal
69%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+311 places)
- Dominant on this surface (67% win rate)
- More effective serve
- More titles on this surface