← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. G. Rennard | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| G. G. Nahum | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Auburn Women 01
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Yarbrough Tennis Center - Court 04
City
Auburn
First serve
M. G. Rennard
Total games
4–12
Recent form
M. G. Rennard · match stats · G. G. Nahum
0Aces0
3Double faults0
69%First serve in88%
55%First-serve points won72%
82%Second serve in100%
29%Second-serve points won60%
38%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted63%
29%Return points won53%
26Service points won29
12Receiver points won29
38Total points won58
4Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak8
3Longest game streak10
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 2–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 1–0 |
Figures read M. G. Rennard first.
Set 255 min · 10 games · newest first
4-5
game 10
G. G. Nahum serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
4-5
game 9
M. G. Rennard serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
3-5
game 8
G. G. Nahum serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
2-5
game 7
M. G. Rennard serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-5
game 6
G. G. Nahum serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-4
game 5
M. G. Rennard serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-4
game 4
G. G. Nahum serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-3
game 3
M. G. Rennard serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
G. G. Nahum serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-1
game 1
M. G. Rennard serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
Set 132 min · 6 games · newest first
0-6
game 6
G. G. Nahum serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-5
game 5
M. G. Rennard serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-4
game 4
G. G. Nahum serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-3
game 3
M. G. Rennard serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-2
game 2
G. G. Nahum serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
0-1
game 1
M. G. Rennard serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
Point chips read M. G. Rennard first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. G. RennardG. G. Nahum
78%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form