← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. Draxl | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| T. Samuel | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
Winnipeg, Canada
Category
Challenger
Round
Final
Surface
hard
Court
Stadium
City
Winnipeg
First serve
T. Samuel
Total games
6–12
Recent form
L. Draxl · match stats · T. Samuel
1Aces6
5Double faults2
73%First serve in60%
59%First-serve points won82%
64%Second serve in89%
29%Second-serve points won53%
17%Break points saved71%
29%Break points converted83%
30%Return points won49%
26Service points won33
14Receiver points won24
40Total points won57
6Games won12
4Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak7
3Longest game streak4
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–3 | 2–2 |
| Set 2 | 1–3 | 3–0 |
Figures read L. Draxl first.
Set 234 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
L. Draxl serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-5
game 7
T. Samuel serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-4
game 6
L. Draxl serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-4
game 5
T. Samuel serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
L. Draxl serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-2
game 3
T. Samuel serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-1
game 2
L. Draxl serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
T. Samuel serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Set 141 min · 10 games · newest first
4-6
game 10
L. Draxl serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
4-5
game 9
T. Samuel serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
4-4
game 8
L. Draxl serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-3
game 7
T. Samuel serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
3-3
game 6
L. Draxl serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
2-3
game 5
T. Samuel serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-3
game 4
L. Draxl serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-2
game 3
T. Samuel serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
L. Draxl serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
T. Samuel serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
Point chips read L. Draxl first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
L. DraxlT. Samuel
57%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+117 places)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
- Strong in tiebreaks (100%)