← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| F. Zeballos | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| F. Forti | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
San Marino, San Marino
Category
Challenger
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
clay
Court
COURT 3
City
San Marino
First serve
F. Forti
Total games
5–12
F. Zeballos · match stats · F. Forti
0Aces6
2Double faults2
54%First serve in60%
59%First-serve points won87%
91%Second serve in90%
52%Second-serve points won55%
0%Break points saved%
%Break points converted100%
26%Return points won44%
28Service points won37
11Receiver points won22
39Total points won59
5Games won12
5Service games won9
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak6
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–2 | 0–2 |
| Set 2 | 0–3 | 2–0 |
Figures read F. Zeballos first.
Set 239 min · 10 games · newest first
4-5
game 10
F. Forti serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-5
game 9
F. Zeballos serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
3-5
game 8
F. Forti serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
3-4
game 7
F. Zeballos serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
3-3
game 6
F. Forti serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
3-2
game 5
F. Zeballos serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
2-2
game 4
F. Forti serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
2-1
game 3
F. Zeballos serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-1
game 2
F. Forti serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-0
game 1
F. Zeballos serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
Set 130 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
F. Forti serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-5
game 6
F. Zeballos serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-5
game 5
F. Forti serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-4
game 4
F. Zeballos serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-3
game 3
F. Forti serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
F. Zeballos serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-1
game 1
F. Forti serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
Point chips read F. Zeballos first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
F. ZeballosF. Forti
73%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+124 places)
- Dominant on this surface (33% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points