← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| F. Gil | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| C. Mahjoob | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ F. Gil
▼ C. Mahjoob
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Ljubljana Men 01
Category
Utr
Round
Semifinals
Surface
clay
Court
Max Tenis Club - Bonifacija 5
City
Ljubljana
First serve
C. Mahjoob
Total games
5–12
F. Gil · match stats · C. Mahjoob
0Aces0
0Double faults1
60%First serve in67%
48%First-serve points won81%
100%Second serve in94%
63%Second-serve points won75%
25%Break points saved%
%Break points converted75%
21%Return points won46%
26Service points won38
10Receiver points won22
36Total points won60
5Games won12
5Service games won9
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak15
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 0–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 0–0 |
Figures read F. Gil first.
Set 226 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
C. Mahjoob serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-5
game 6
F. Gil serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-4
game 5
C. Mahjoob serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
F. Gil serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-2
game 3
C. Mahjoob serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-1
game 2
F. Gil serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-1
game 1
C. Mahjoob serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
Set 153 min · 10 games · newest first
4-6
game 10
F. Gil serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
4-5
game 9
C. Mahjoob serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
4-4
game 8
F. Gil serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
3-4
game 7
C. Mahjoob serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-3
game 6
F. Gil serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
2-3
game 5
C. Mahjoob serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-2
game 4
F. Gil serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-2
game 3
C. Mahjoob serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-1
game 2
F. Gil serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-1
game 1
C. Mahjoob serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
Point chips read F. Gil first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
F. GilC. Mahjoob
61%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Slight statistical edge