Carolina Bohrer Martins vs Harper Stone — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
C. Bohrer Martins	2	1	0
H. Stone	6	6	2

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Rome GA Women 01

C. Bohrer Martins

W A. Aulia 2–0 W G. Davis 2–0 W I. Ashar 2–1 L C. Fouhety 0–2 W V. Shue 2–1

H. Stone

W G. Davis 2–0 W I. Ashar 2–0 L A. Aulia 0–2

C. Bohrer Martins · match stats · H. Stone

1Aces0

2Double faults0

73%First serve in78%

37%First-serve points won67%

85%Second serve in100%

46%Second-serve points won46%

50%Break points saved50%

50%Break points converted50%

38%Return points won60%

19Service points won36

22Receiver points won29

41Total points won65

3Games won12

2Service games won7

0Tiebreaks won0

5Longest point streak8

2Longest game streak5

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–0	0–0
Set 2	1–0	2–0

Figures read C. Bohrer Martins first.

Set 27 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 H. Stone serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 30-40

1-5 game 6 C. Bohrer Martins serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40

1-4 game 5 H. Stone serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 30-40

1-3 game 4 C. Bohrer Martins serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

1-2 game 3 H. Stone serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

1-1 game 2 C. Bohrer Martins serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40 30-40 40-40 A-40

0-1 game 1 H. Stone serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40 30-40

Set 18 games · newest first

2-6 game 8 C. Bohrer Martins serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40

2-5 game 7 H. Stone serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40

2-4 game 6 C. Bohrer Martins serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

2-3 game 5 H. Stone serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40

1-3 game 4 C. Bohrer Martins serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30

0-3 game 3 H. Stone serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

0-2 game 2 C. Bohrer Martins serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40

0-1 game 1 H. Stone serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A

Point chips read C. Bohrer Martins first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

C. Bohrer MartinsH. Stone

56%

44%

56%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form