Vivien Sandberg vs Polina Kuharenko — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
V. Sandberg	1	1	0
P. Kuharenko	6	6	2

Momentum — game by game, ● = break

▲ V. Sandberg ▼ P. Kuharenko

Match facts

Tournament

UTR Ahaus W01

V. Sandberg

L D. Marcinkēviča 0–2 L A. Lazar 0–2 L R. de Koning 0–2 W S. van Ham 2–0 W F. Dell'Edera 2–0

P. Kuharenko

W D. Marcinkēviča 2–0 W S. Olff 2–0 W V. Gudelj 2–0 W S. Hurrion 2–0 W Z. Veljačić 2–0

V. Sandberg · match stats · P. Kuharenko

0Aces2

6Double faults1

61%First serve in48%

30%First-serve points won81%

65%Second serve in96%

41%Second-serve points won48%

14%Break points saved50%

50%Break points converted86%

36%Return points won66%

15Service points won28

16Receiver points won29

31Total points won57

2Games won12

1Service games won6

0Tiebreaks won0

3Longest point streak7

1Longest game streak4

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–0	3–0
Set 2	0–2	3–1

Figures read V. Sandberg first.

Set 27 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40 40-40 40-A

1-5 game 6 V. Sandberg serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

1-4 game 5 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40

1-3 game 4 V. Sandberg serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

1-2 game 3 P. Kuharenko serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40

0-2 game 2 V. Sandberg serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40

0-1 game 1 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

Set 17 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 V. Sandberg serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

1-5 game 6 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40

1-4 game 5 V. Sandberg serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30

0-4 game 4 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

0-3 game 3 V. Sandberg serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A

0-2 game 2 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40

0-1 game 1 V. Sandberg serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40

Point chips read V. Sandberg first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

V. SandbergP. Kuharenko

21%

79%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form