Luis Llorens Saracho vs Matej Kajzer — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
L. L. Saracho	6	6	2
M. Kajzer	0	3	0

Momentum — game by game, ● = break

▲ L. L. Saracho ▼ M. Kajzer

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT South Bend Men 01

L. L. Saracho

L S. Dominko 0–2 W N. Hernandez 2–0 W N. Becker 2–0

M. Kajzer

L. L. Saracho · match stats · M. Kajzer

2Aces2

1Double faults5

63%First serve in54%

66%First-serve points won62%

95%Second serve in77%

58%Second-serve points won23%

67%Break points saved55%

45%Break points converted33%

56%Return points won37%

32Service points won21

27Receiver points won19

59Total points won40

12Games won3

7Service games won2

0Tiebreaks won0

5Longest point streak6

6Longest game streak1

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	2–0	1–2
Set 2	0–2	0–3

Figures read L. L. Saracho first.

Set 29 games · newest first

6-3 game 9 L. L. Saracho serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 40-30

5-3 game 8 M. Kajzer serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

5-2 game 7 L. L. Saracho serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

4-2 game 6 M. Kajzer serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

4-1 game 5 L. L. Saracho serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40

3-1 game 4 M. Kajzer serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40

2-1 game 3 L. L. Saracho serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30

1-1 game 2 M. Kajzer serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 30-40 40-40 A-40

0-1 game 1 L. L. Saracho serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40

Set 16 games · newest first

6-0 game 6 M. Kajzer serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

5-0 game 5 L. L. Saracho serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40

4-0 game 4 M. Kajzer serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 A-40

3-0 game 3 L. L. Saracho serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30

2-0 game 2 M. Kajzer serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15

1-0 game 1 L. L. Saracho serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15 40-30

Point chips read L. L. Saracho first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

L. L. SarachoM. Kajzer

55%

45%

55%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Slight statistical edge