← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| G. Kregar | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| B. E. Molnar | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ G. Kregar
▼ B. E. Molnar
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT South Bend Women 01
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Eck Tennis Facility - Court 5
City
Notre Dame
First serve
G. Kregar
Total games
4–12
Recent form
G. Kregar
B. E. Molnar
W P. Lingam 2–0G. Kregar · match stats · B. E. Molnar
1Aces2
2Double faults3
54%First serve in64%
44%First-serve points won81%
90%Second serve in80%
33%Second-serve points won40%
33%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted67%
33%Return points won61%
18Service points won28
14Receiver points won28
32Total points won56
4Games won12
2Service games won6
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak8
2Longest game streak6
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–2 | 2–2 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 0–1 |
Figures read G. Kregar first.
Set 28 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
G. Kregar serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-5
game 7
B. E. Molnar serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-4
game 6
G. Kregar serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-3
game 5
B. E. Molnar serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
2-2
game 4
G. Kregar serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
2-1
game 3
B. E. Molnar serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-0
game 2
G. Kregar serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-0
game 1
B. E. Molnar serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
Set 18 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
G. Kregar serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-5
game 7
B. E. Molnar serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-5
game 6
G. Kregar serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
0-5
game 5
B. E. Molnar serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-4
game 4
G. Kregar serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-3
game 3
B. E. Molnar serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
0-2
game 2
G. Kregar serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-1
game 1
B. E. Molnar serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Point chips read G. Kregar first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
G. KregarB. E. Molnar
54%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Very evenly matched