← All matches
Rafael Lacerda
Chapecoense
Cruzeiro
Chapecoense
4-5-1 · 4-2-3-1
Cruzeiro
Expected goals (xG) flow
per shotMatch momentum
Minute-by-minute pressure. Bars toward a team mean sustained attacking territory.
Average positions
formation shapeShot map
xG sizedGoalOn targetOff / blocked● size = xG
Goal
On target
Off target
Blocked
● size = xG
Tap a player for their full match card.
Highlights 1 clip
Player of the match
Match events
Half-time · 0–0
46'
🔁
N. Pessoa ◂ Y. Bolasie
62'
🔁
D. Antunes ◂ Fernando
68'
🔁
B. Rodrigues ◂ M. Pereira
74'
🔁
Ênio ◂ G. Augusto
75'
🔁
G. Rojas ◂ L. Villalba
75'
🔁
F. Morais ◂ K. Kenji
75'
🔁
M. Henrique ◂ Gerson
76'
🔁
B. Matias ◂ Max
83'
🔁
W. Furtado ◂ Fagner
85'
🔁
R. Tadeu ◂ Marcinho
Full-time · 0–0
Coaches
Artur Jorge 
Recent form
DASantos2-2
LHFlamengo0-4
LABahia0-2
WAGrêmio2-1
LAPalmeiras0-1
WACoritiba1-0
LHBotafogo0-1
WAInternacional2-1
LHGrêmio1-3
WHDefensor Sporting2-0
Where to watch
PremiereSportv
Match facts
Referee
Raphael Claus
Kickoff
02 Aug, 21:30 UTC
Competition
Copa do Brasil
Highlights & clips
98
Anderson
7.7
20
B. Tubarão
7.1
15
R. Thyere
7.0
3
E. Doma
6.8
91
B. Pacheco
6.8
70
R. Tadeu
6.7
↑ 85'
16
B. Matias
6.5
↑ 76'
27
Camilo
6.4
19
D. Antunes
6.6
↑ 62'
18
N. Pessoa
6.4
↑ 46'
97
Ênio
6.4
↑ 74'
81
Otávio
6.9
12
W. Furtado
6.6
↑ 83'
15
F. Bruno
7.7
34
J. Jesus
7.3
27
G. Rojas
6.5
↑ 75'
29
L. Romero
7.0
38
F. Morais
6.5
↑ 75'
99
K. Arroyo
7.0
9
B. Rodrigues
6.8
↑ 68'
7
M. Henrique
6.7
↑ 75'
19
K. Jorge
6.5
Top stats
37%Possession63%
0.3Expected goals (xG)0.89
13Total shots13
2Shots on target1
6Corners7
Shots
6Shots off target6
5Blocked shots6
7Shots inside box6
6Shots outside box7
0Hit woodwork0
Attack
41Final third entries62
3Offsides1
7Free kicks11
0Fouled in final third2
Passing
326Passes548
270Accurate passes484
24/47 (51%)Long balls21/40 (53%)
5/20 (25%)Crosses7/35 (20%)
15Throw-ins15
Duels
41Duels59
20/52 (38%)Ground duels29/48 (60%)
8/17 (47%)Aerial duels10/17 (59%)
3/6 (50%)Dribbles10/13 (77%)
9Dispossessed5
Defending
10Tackles11
70Tackles won55
14Interceptions9
35Clearances20
37Recoveries41
Discipline
11Fouls7
0Yellow cards0
0Red cards0
Goalkeeping
1Saves2
13Goal kicks7
Forecast BSD enginebest price across 64 bookmakers
Who winsCruzeiro to win (DNB) 72% · 1.36 @ 10bet
1X2Cruzeiro to win 53% · 1.88 @ 1xBet
GoalsUnder 2.5 goals 55% · 1.77 @ betfair
BTTSBTTS: No 52% · 1.92 @ 1xBet
GoalsUnder 3.5 goals 75% · 1.29 @ boylesports
1X2Draw 27% · 3.66 @ granmadrid
CornersOver 8.5 corners 57% · 1.67 @ Bet365
CornersUnder 9.5 corners 54% · 1.91 @ Pinnacle
CornersUnder 10.5 corners 65% · 1.53 @ Pinnacle
GoalsOver 1.5 goals 69% · 1.41 @ betfair
1X2Chapecoense to win 20% · 5.40 @ betfair
Odds consensus
1X2consensus
4.70
Chapecoense
3.42
Draw
1.74
Cruzeiro
Double Chanceconsensus
1.98
Chapecoense or Draw
1.28
Chapecoense or Cruzeiro
1.17
Draw or Cruzeiro
Both Teams to Scoreconsensus
1.95
Yes
1.77
No
Total Goals 0.50consensus
1.07
Over 0.50 ▲
8.31
Under 0.50 ▲
Total Goals 1.50consensus
1.34
Over 1.50
3.01
Under 1.50
Total Goals 2.50consensus
2.08
Over 2.50
1.69
Under 2.50
Total Goals 3.50consensus
3.68
Over 3.50
1.24
Under 3.50
Total Goals 4.50consensus
7.52
Over 4.50 ▲
1.08
Under 4.50 ▲
Draw No Betconsensus
3.42
Chapecoense
1.28
Cruzeiro
Total Corners (O/U) 3.50consensus
15.00
Under 3.50 ▼
Total Corners (O/U) 4.50consensus
1.02
Over 4.50 ▲
13.00
Under 4.50 ▲
Total Corners (O/U) 5.50consensus
1.08
Over 5.50 ▲
8.00
Under 5.50 ▲
Total Corners (O/U) 6.50consensus
1.16
Over 6.50 ▲
4.46
Under 6.50 ▲
Total Corners (O/U) 7.50consensus
1.33
Over 7.50 ▼
2.99
Under 7.50 ▲
Total Corners (O/U) 8.50consensus
1.58
Over 8.50 ▼
2.22
Under 8.50 ▼
Total Corners (O/U) 9.50consensus
1.95
Over 9.50 ▼
1.76
Under 9.50 ▲
No pre-match call on this one.
Nothing reached 80% confidence before kick-off, so we stayed quiet rather than guess. Most matches end up here — that is what keeps the published calls at 86.9%.
Nothing reached 80% confidence before kick-off, so we stayed quiet rather than guess. Most matches end up here — that is what keeps the published calls at 86.9%.
Report a data issue
Spotted something wrong on this match? Tell us what and we'll fix it.